Skip to main content
Article
100%
HD

Imagine a pile of lightweight, friction‑less plastic balls arranged in different shapes. Some look like a porous sponge, others like a tighter cluster. When you press on these piles, the balls squeeze together and at a certain point the material "jams." The pressure becomes visible and the pile behaves like a solid platform.

Scientists created three types certainly using three different growth methods. The first method, called reaction‑limited aggregation, produces dense, compact structures. The second, ballistic particle‑cluster aggregation, creates intermediate‑density aggregates. The third, diffusion‑limited aggregation, forms very porous aggregates.

By compressing each aggregate with a shrinking circular boundary, researchers measured pressure as a function of the volume fraction occupied by the balls. For dense and intermediate aggregates, pressure jumps from zero to a finite value at a precise critical packing fraction φJ. For the most porous aggregate, the transition is smoother.

The jamming threshold depends on the initial structure: φJ ≈ 0.765 for the dense case, ≈ 0.727 for the intermediate case, and ≈ 0.602 for the porous case. Above φJ, pressure follows P ≈ A (φ‑φJ)², meaning bulk modulus K grows linearly with excess packing. Rigid‑cluster analysis shows that the average coordination number in the largest rigid cluster also rises linearly with φ‑φJ, mirroring random spring networks.

These findings suggest that particle sponges compact like spring networks, a behavior that could guide the design of soft, resilient materials.

Bonus
100%
HD

Jamming transition in porous aggregates was investigated using the distinct‑element method, treating each particle as an independent body. By simulating a shrinking circular boundary, researchers obtained pressure as a function. For dense (RLA) and intermediate (BPCA) aggregates, pressure jumps from zero to a finite value at φJ, while for highly porous (DLA) aggregates the transition is smoother.

Extrapolated φJ values are φJ = 0.765 ± 0.004 for RLA, φJ = 0.727 ± 0.004 for BPCA, and φJ = 0.602 ± 0.023 for DLA. Above φJ, pressure follows P ≈ A (φ‑φJ)², implying bulk modulus K ∝ (φ‑φJ). This power‑law is characteristic of zero‑force systems and random spring networks.

Rigid‑cluster analysis shows that the average coordination number Z in the largest rigid cluster grows linearly with φ‑φJ, confirming the spring‑network analogy. The dependence of stiffness on volume fraction is a hallmark of jamming, relevant for powders, granules, and porous materials in geology, engineering, and materials science.

These findings enable predictive models for mechanical behavior of porous aggregates under load, with potential applications in designing soft materials and modeling natural phenomena such as seismic response of faults.

Ask AI

Explore key aspects of this story with 3 quick insights

Source

Date Published:
Original Article arxiv.org
Fact-check verified on 09/11/2026 Primary Study / Original Source
Read our Editorial Guidelines & AI Ethics Policy
Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Keep exploring

Discover the full archive of science bites or head back to home

Riconnessione al server... Aggiornamento della sessione in corso
Connessione interrotta Impossibile stabilire il collegamento
Sessione aggiornata Ricarica per visualizzare i contenuti