Skip to main content
Article
100%
HD

Have you ever thought that a computer could understand how creative you are? We are not talking about simple multiple-choice tests, but something much more advanced. A new study has introduced a high-tech method to identify scientific talent in young people using artificial intelligence.

The challenge is that assessing creativity is incredibly difficult: every student expresses their ideas differently, through drawings and written explanations. To solve this puzzle, researchers used special techniques called 'data augmentation' and 'pseudo-labeling.' Imagine having only a few puzzle pieces: these techniques create new pieces similar to the originals to complete the picture and help the AI learn more effectively.

The AI analyzes how your drawings and words fit together. If you can explain a scientific idea with an original drawing and a precise description, the system recognizes your huge potential. The most interesting part? The study found that curiosity and the environment we grow up in are the main drivers of our creativity. So, keep asking questions and exploring the world: technology is ready to notice how brilliant you are!

Bonus
100%
HD

The research addresses the problem of 'odal heterogeneity,' which is the difficulty for AI to make different types of data, such as text and images, work together. To overcome data scarcity, researchers used the SMOTE algorithm to expand questionnaire data and EDA (Easy Data Augmentation) to enrich visual and textual data. A key element is 'pseudo-labeling': a process where the model assigns temporary labels to unlabeled data based on its confidence, allowing the algorithm to learn from a much larger amount of information without constant human intervention. This multimodality approach allows for capturing the 'emantic alignment' between what a student writes and what they draw, providing a much more accurate measure of abstraction and innovation capacity compared to traditional tests.

Ask AI

Explore key aspects of this story with 3 quick insights

Source

Authors:
Weini WengChang LiuGuoli ZhaoLuwei SongXingli Zhang
Date Published:
Original Article www.mdpi.com
Fact-check verified on 20/07/2026
Read our Editorial Guidelines & AI Ethics Policy
Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Keep exploring

Discover the full archive of science bites or head back to home

Riconnessione al server... Aggiornamento della sessione in corso
Connessione interrotta Impossibile stabilire il collegamento
Sessione aggiornata Ricarica per visualizzare i contenuti