Quantitative trading is changing its mind. It's no longer just about models predicting prices, but agent systems capable of reasoning, using tools, remembering and learning. These agents operate in five phases: factor identification, signal discovery, portfolio construction, order execution and risk management. The goal? Create autonomous systems that manage the entire process, from theory to the real market. Today, however, many systems focus only on signal discovery, while other phases are often delegated to separate processes. The challenge is to integrate everything smoothly. Another key aspect is evaluation: often a model very good at predicting does not prove effective in real trading. Multi-agent systems tend to merge results, even if workflows are increasingly complex. According to research, greater coordination between parts and a more realistic performance assessment are needed. The future of trading could be driven by increasingly independent agents capable of adapting to the market.
Agent-based quantitative trading represents a significant evolution compared to traditional model-based approaches. These systems incorporate logical reasoning components, external tool usage (tool use), long-term memory and continuous feedback mechanisms. The factor mining phase deals with the identification of statistical variables relevant to predicting financial market behavior. Signal discovery uses advanced machine learning techniques to extract meaningful patterns from market data. Portfolio construction applies optimization algorithms to balance risks and returns. Order execution manages the sending of orders to exchanges with minimization of market impact. Risk management monitors and adjusts exposure parameters in real time. Despite progress, most research focuses on signal discovery, with less integration between other phases. Multi-agent systems often entrust the final decision to aggregation mechanisms, even when subsystems show heterogeneous behaviors. Evaluation criticisms show how high predictive capabilities do not guarantee operational success under real market conditions. More sophisticated benchmarks are needed that take into account the dynamic complexity of the market and the robustness of strategies over the long term.
